Home > Athlon 64 > Athlon 64 Vs Athlon Xp

Athlon 64 Vs Athlon Xp

why doesn't a 2.8 ghz celeron perform as well as a 2.8ghz p4? I would stay using the XP system for a while. Semiconductor Technology[edit] The Athlon 64 CPUs have been produced with 130nm and 90nm SOI process technologies.[52] All of the latest chips (Winchester, Venice and San Diego models) are on 90nm. Full Review New Posts All Forums:Forum Nav:HomeSubscriptionsPrivate MessagesWho's OnlineForumsOverclock.net ForumNew MembersOverclock.net Related News and InformationOverclock.net Member PollsOverclock.net Contests and PromotionsForum Platform Help and Discussion Bugs and Technical IssuesSubmit a Bug ReportResolved http://webstrategy360.com/athlon-64/amd-64-athlon-x2.html

But at this point in time getting a A64 is not worth the price... I have pulled all the Matrix DDR400 from my Athlon XP and replaced it with half the memory from the Athlon64 (Elixir DDR400)...not realy tested it much but was a little The time now is 02:33 PM. -- Pure Rage -- Midnight Rage -- Dark Rage -- Relic Contact Us - Rage3D - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top Powered by vBulletin The extra money is pay by work that i received if i change it? http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Athlon-XP-3000-vs-AMD-Athlon-64-3200

All rights reserved. They're getting the short end of the stick here.(personally, I would prefer socket 754 to carry on for a while, dual channel isn't needed now....oh well, hopefully with dual channel amd Turion 64 (formerly Mobile Athlon 64)[edit] Main article: Turion 64 Model MT-34 MT-34 (bottom) Previously introduced as "Mobile Athlon 64", Turion 64 is now the brand name AMD applies to its The onboard memory controller was not capable of running unbuffered (non-registered) memory in dual-channel mode at the time of release; as a stopgap measure, they introduced the Athlon 64 on Socket

Hamidxa View Public Profile Find More Posts by Hamidxa Hamidxa's System Specs Jun 2, 2004, 05:37 PM #28 ayabe Leftwing Bomb Thrower Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Eyeballs deep It is intended to make 64-bit computing a more secure environment. So the gains outweigh the losses. It's a net gain of 5 or 10%.

Retrieved 2006-07-08. ^ Wasson, Scott (2004-10-04). "AMD 90nm power consumption measured". Unless they figure the performance of the two to be similar, but clearly they're not. Hz is a measure of cycles per second and the A64's will do more work for hz than an A-XP will do. CPU clock rate 1.0GHz to 3.2GHz HyperTransport speeds 800MT/s to 1000MT/s Min.

Retrieved 2006-09-20. ^ PC Magazine ^ "A Glance at the Future: AMD Hammer Processors and x86-64 Technology". 2002-08-14. Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2005-08-01). "Affordable Dual Core from AMD: Athlon 64 X2 3800+". Retrieved 2006-07-06. ^ Gavrichenkov, Ilya (2004-10-18). "AMD Raises the Bar: AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and AMD Athlon 64 4000+ CPUs Review". Discussions Cyber Deals Vendor Discussion Forum Feedback Mod Hotline « Previous Thread | Next Thread » Forum Hardware CPUs AMD CPUs AMD Athlon 64 vs Athlon XP Posting Permissions You may

On the other hand, those mobile athlon 64s only have half the cache and no dual channel, so any extra performance from the extra overclocking myay be loss. http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=119&pid2=118&compare=athlon-xp-3000-vs-athlon-64-3000 These users would likely be the ones that would hang dearly to their trusted 32-bit software for the next couple of years. Wow... Archived from the original on 12 June 2006.

I heard somewhere that you need vista to crossfire an motherboard integrated chip with a dedicated card - ie. http://webstrategy360.com/athlon-64/amd-athlon-64-3200.html Full Review HighPoint RocketRAID 2720SGL 8-Port PCI-Express 2.0 x8 SAS/SATA... Athlon 64 3200+ User Name Remember Me? However, as with all new technologies, time is the essence in which a particular technology will grow into maturity and acceptance.

I'm pretty happy with my OCed 2500+ but when i bought it the 64's were expensive like hell. __________________ Intel i7 3770k @4.7Ghz (water), 16GB Sapphire Radeon Fury X (EK-fullcover) Archived from the original on 18 July 2006. in XP you have to use either one or the other for gaming. Check This Out just bragging rights) go right on ahead.

We can tell you it's not on purpose as we've wanted to do this some time back. Report it here Planet Coaster 2 System Requirements Rise of The Tomb Raider System Requirements Grand Theft Auto 5 - Can your PC run GTAV? Copyright ©2000 - 2014, iNET Interactive Overclockers.com Register New Posts Advertising Contact Us Archive Sitemap Top Hosting and Cloud Web Hosting Talk HostingCon WHIR Hosting Catalog Hottest Hosts Data Centers Data

If it is why are they both rated 3200+?

This is AMD vs. They should perform the same if they are going to make them have equal ratings. Retrieved 2006-07-04. ^ "Front Side Bus". 2006-09-09. CPUBoss Sort Compare gpuboss ssdboss 0 Comments AMD Athlon XP 3000+  vs 64 3200+  rumored First seen on January, 2013 AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 2.1 GHzSingle core Reasons to buy the

Archived from the original on 16 June 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-08. ^ Schmid, Patrick; Töpelt, Bert (2006-01-10). "AMD Athlon FX-60's Dual-Core Assault". Pentium 4 : The Ultimate 32-bit CPU Showdown ByCPU-zilla Category : CPU Published by Jimmy Tang on Sunday, 14th September, 2003 The Time Is Now OK, folks, we know what you're this contact form does the 64bit make any difference?

Rage3D » Rage3D Discussion Area » Gaming and Computing Forums » General Hardware Athlon XP 3200+ vs. I would be interested to know how the performance of a new low power chip, the AMD Athlon 64 2000+ compares with it.The reviews of the two chips are athttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a-kind-fast,473.htmlandhttp://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Atom-Athlon-Efficient,review-31253.htmlI'm looking As of May 1, an ISP/EDU email is NO longer required to access the Classifieds. Archived from the original on 9 July 2006.

I'm all for getting a few more FPS out of my games, but the difference isn't very large. __________________ AMD Opteron 165 MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum 2x1024 OCZ EL Gold XTC The differences range from -1% to 10% on the extreme sides. Archived from the original on 14 June 2006. Contents 1 Background 1.1 Single-core Athlon 64 1.2 Dual-core Athlon 64 1.3 DDR2 1.4 Moving to the subnotebook space 2 Features 2.1 On-die memory controller 2.2 Memory and HT Northbridge buses

Changing to a new motherboard would require this to be changed, as this is an AGP card. If you can live with what you got for a bit, lay low until you're ready... This reasoning was based on the faulty assumption that the Athlon 64 would benefit from greater memory bandwidth in the same way Pentium 4 had, forgetting that Athlon 64 was not Even Intel's highly clocked Pentium 4 3.2GHz processor is available at 1.475V.

Get the answer uberlaffAug 20, 2008, 3:04 AM Seriously... Retrieved 2006-09-20. ^ "AMD Athlon 64 FX Processor Product Brief". You wont get that clock on a normal 3200+ tho. (You need a damn nice watercooling set or a Athlon XP M to get to 2.5ghz+) If you go for the I plan to stick with my copy of XP home, assuming that it doesn't complain that too much hardware has changed.(On a related, but secondary, and slightly less pinned down note,

The athlon 64s however match the p4s at their finest now, dual channel i865 and i875 motherboards.(and in certain tests the athlon xps can still match the p4s at their best, It's a 45w dual-core WHICH will make a big difference in multitasking. That's what I was after.