Home > Background Image > Background Image Position

Background Image Position


The image "covers" the entire width or height of the container. You'll have to be creative. Personally I use a script to deal with it using jQuery, its an adaption of imgsizer. So, if you trust Apple as a good standard, then I’d say go with double.Download Speed / Page Loading TimeThere have been a couple of bigger studies (gomez.com and akamai.com) discussing weblink

This should drop your filesize quite a bit. the answer is still correct even if more information has been added since then. There are many variations and different syntaxes you can use for this property, all of which have different use cases. Here's my code below. http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_background-size.asp

Background Image Position

As for really making the image shrink and grow with the container, you would need to use some layering tricks to make the image appear to function as a background and Thirdly, you can control where the background image starts. Fortunately, CSS3 introduces the background-size property which allows backgrounds to be stretched or squashed. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Note: This is not the currently-specified behavior, which is that the intrinsic dimensions and proportion should be those of the element in all cases. Be on a desktop or mobile device? It seems like the following should work for you:
body {
background: url(“images/rocks_stones_pebbles_1280.jpg”) no-repeat fixed 0 0 #000;
background-size: cover;
-moz-background-size: cover;
-webkit-background-size: cover;
'16 at 18:13 Al Foиce ѫ 2,66921731 answered Jun 19 '12 at 11:35 maksbd19 1,5411023 Thank you for taking the time to do

thx for posting. –Don Cote Nov 28 '11 at 23:44 1 This is great for making it the background shrink too. Css Background Image Size To Fit Hide Newsletter Sign-up See also CSSCSS ReferenceCSS Background and BordersGuidesBorder-image generatorBorder-radius generatorScaling background imagesUsing CSS multiple backgroundsPropertiesbackgroundbackground-attachmentbackground-clipbackground-colorbackground-imagebackground-originbackground-position background-position-x background-position-ybackground-repeatbackground-sizeborderborder-bottomborder-bottom-colorborder-bottom-left-radiusborder-bottom-right-radiusborder-bottom-styleborder-bottom-widthborder-colorborder-imageborder-image-outsetborder-image-repeatborder-image-sliceborder-image-sourceborder-image-widthborder-leftborder-left-colorborder-left-styleborder-left-widthborder-radiusborder-rightborder-right-colorborder-right-styleborder-right-widthborder-styleborder-topborder-top-colorborder-top-left-radiusborder-top-right-radiusborder-top-styleborder-top-widthborder-width © 2005-2017 Mozilla Developer Network and individual contributors. Can a company block a specific person from buying its stock? This is very useful statistics and analytics.

Please note that this is a CSS3 property. Css Background Shorthand share|improve this answer edited Sep 28 '13 at 15:13 answered Jan 26 '12 at 11:02 vinyll 6,37621519 90 To preserve the aspect ratio of the image you should use "background-size: integrated with other element positionsSome Examples (as of original writing)Here are some examples of bigger corporation websites using full screen background images:1400 x 875 -1.6 ratio- Patagonia1920 x 1080 -1.78 ratio- General Motors1920 x Firefox for Android 49 and later also implement this property prefixed with -webkit.

Css Background Image Size To Fit

In it, you'll get: The week's top questions and answers Important community announcements Questions that need answers see an example newsletter By subscribing, you agree to the privacy policy and terms Let's take a look at a few examples to demonstrate this. Background Image Position It would stretch until the longer side reaches the width or height of the outer container and therefore preserving the image. Css Background Image Size To Fit Screen Let's take a look at a quick example.

There's no current way of doing this with CSS... have a peek at these guys As in example H above, although the original image is slightly larger than the containing element, and as such is reduced in size, the aspect ratios of the image and containing This way your background picture has always got the same size as the width of the screen and the height will allways have the right size. #background { width: 100%; height: Edit: There's also -webkit-background-size and -moz-background-size. Html Background Image Size To Fit

The interpretation of possible values depends on the image's intrinsic dimensions (width and height) and intrinsic proportion (ratio of width and height).  A bitmap image always has intrinsic dimensions and an Top 10 Tutorials HTML Tutorial CSS Tutorial JavaScript Tutorial W3.CSS Tutorial Bootstrap Tutorial SQL Tutorial PHP Tutorial jQuery Tutorial Angular Tutorial XML Tutorial Top 10 References HTML Reference CSS Reference JavaScript Some parts of the background image may not be in view within the background positioning area Play it » contain Scale the image to the largest size such that both its check over here Note that background sizing for vector images that lack intrinsic dimensions or proportion is not yet fully implemented in all browsers.  Be careful about relying on the behavior described above, and

See How To: Resizeable Background Image. –Ricardo de la Vega Dec 18 '09 at 11:18 add a comment| 18 Answers 18 active oldest votes up vote 558 down vote accepted CSS2 Css Background Image Size To Fit Div Not the answer you're looking for? You can use repeatable patterns to give the illusion of the same effect.

It just has a convenient cross-browser test for it.

Glad I found this article, thanks. The jump is abnormally high and I wasn't able to understand/track down what caused it. Here's a very basic example. Css Background Image Scale To Fit You cannot expect it to do the same things as Chrome 19, Firefox 13 or Opera 12 which were all released within the last month.

So, in DreamWeaver you'll need to search the help files for how to edit the CSS for your page, be it inline CSS or a separate stylesheet. Alternatively, you can use javascript to change the CSS settings depending on the window size, but this isn't preferred. Chris Coyer has a nice explanation of it here. this content I slap in as many as needed, basically, until all the button background appears.

Say, for instance, that you have  a big swoosh in the background image that MUST cross the header a just the right place. They also have a great server response time, which means they're likely using solid (not cheap) hosting.Run these tools on your site to get some detail into what you can do Will it resize to shrink or stretch? background-size: 50% auto; The width of the background image therefore depends on the size of its container.

In ie8/ie9, the image only shows up for about 3/4 of the div. Example J (Opens in a new browser window/tab) Here's the code for this example: body { background-image: url(img/betweengrassandsky.png); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-color: #EEE; background-size: contain; } Example K Now let's take a This is a number I've come to over time and is supported only through anecdotal evidence, not real hard data. 1MB seems to load quickly enough for most people today that Is it information heavy or image heavy?

This differs from "background-size: cover" –Pavel Vlasov Jul 28 '11 at 9:52 1 this one actually works –Bozho Sep 4 '11 at 20:27 1 this stretched for me on Additional Notes and Further Reading The specification makes the following statement as to how the background-size property interactives with the background-repeat property: If ‘background-repeat’ is ‘round’ for one (or both) dimensions, I want to do something like: background: url('bg.gif') top repeat-y; background-size: 490px; But it seems it's totally wrong to do it like that... also would have been good for me to see this syntax in context to a page layout or at the very least a div set up.

This is both to improve quality of the resize (given that your image software does a better job than the browsers), and to save bandwidth if the original image is larger Serge says: March 9, 2016 at 4:41 pmI am trying to get the initial page down in size, using the slider with images at around 1200×300 and having a real hard Simple. This scales image so it fits the container.

The best way I've found to do this is to use Javascript in combination with modernizr (or other means of tagging 'OLDIE'). –AndrewPK Jan 22 '13 at 15:01 add a comment| Take a look at the demonstration page to see real examples. Note: If the value of this property is not set in a background shorthand property that is applied to the element after the background-size CSS property, the value of this property The correct answer is "cover" from below.

I tried removing the tags to see if it this wont be stripped out. //htmldiv class="contentInnerWrapper" div class="defaultInnerWrapper" div class="slidercontainer" div id="slides" img src="images/consumer_slide1.png" alt="" img src="images/consumer_slide2.png" alt="" div div div