Home > General > Atrac3's

Atrac3's

Pio2001 Hero Member Joined: 29 September, 2001 Posts: 3,939 Logged Global Moderator ATRAC3 superior or inferior to mp3 ? Latexxx Hero Member Joined: 12 May, 2003 Posts: 844 Logged ATRAC3 superior or inferior to mp3 ? more impressed with SS 2.0. Thus there might be a strong bias for ATRAC in both tests.

Just brainstorming... I'm not sure what's the limmit for the length since I tested all limmits that are mentioned around the net and all seemed to be untrue, all worked well. Open GoldWave (the program) and drag-and-drop your audio file inside the gray/empty field. Creating an high quality audio codec for hardware is much more difficult than for software, due to constraints as complexity, battery life etc. https://forums.techguy.org/threads/atrac3s.80801/

FigLeaf Newbie Joined: 08 June, 2002 Posts: 3 Logged MPC -insane vs. Reply #22 – 13 July, 2004, 06:03:40 AM QuoteThese graphs are very important: they are proving either that encoders used for this test are totally different from encoders available for MD Have to do a few things for win7 to recognize the codec. Perhaps a good codec should not sound good, but reproduce in a transparent way.

from looking at spectrograms (please don't hit me), ATRAC3 seems derivative of mp3 in many respects, whereas ATRAC (SP mode) is a completely different beast.of course that says nothing of the Sony to dump Connect music service - (August 31st, 2007) Sony acknowledged that its proprietary ATRAC music format was a market flop by shutting down all its Connect music stores and Reply With Quote 05-12-2004,02:45 PM #108 Unregistered Re: ATRAC3 & ATRAC3Plus Support to correct an earlier post :- Atrac3Plus is supported on HiMD and Atrac CD Walkman units. You can ignore it and close Goldwave since you don't need it anymore.

Thread Status: Not open for further replies. We haven't done any testing on ATRAC3Plus at 256kbit modes so I don't think it's easy to conclude. http://www.last.fm/user/spase-spase- spase Hero Member Joined: 22 October, 2001 Posts: 773 Logged MPC -insane vs. What you will need: - Those files: http://www.mediafire.com/?pbracy5iire7y1s - Your audio file you want to use. (it can be at any file format [wav/mp3/ogg/aac/ac3...] but make sure it's Stereo, 16Bit, 44100Hz[most

the fileformat .PAM is used in combination with .AT3 (both files in the same folder) And .PAM videos can contain sound optionally (developers can decide if adding the audio inside the Also note that MiniDisc took off in Japan/Asia in general when it was introduced, so that's why I'm saying that it had a presence compared to MP3, which wouldn't have been I don't have the ABX test to show that personally onhand, but I find that the main difference is that ATRAC3 does not suffer from upper-frequency artefacting nearly as much. MP3 is old too, but it wasn't designed with particular hardware specifications in mind, and certainly it didn't really show up until much later than MiniDisc did.

I would re-download them but i have around 400 songs, along with a slow internet connection, so you can see the difficulty. http://www.head-fi.org/t/133125/normalizing-atrac3s-quality-issues Full Review RHA CL1 Ceramic Reviewed by daduy Disclaimer I got this unit as part of Australia/New Zealand tour arranged by @RHA Team, thank you very much for including Does anyone know any good programs for this purpose? PSPgo PSVita PSX DVR PTP Public Knowledge Pulldown PUO PVR Pwn2Own PX Q Q-Pel QAM QCIF Qflix Qpel QQVGA QSXGA QT Quad eXtended Graphics Array Quad HDTV Quad Super Extended Graphics

LP4 is really bad and suffers from joint-stereo artifacts and such, and is probably only useful for recording lectures. I may have to go to my local HiFi store and use my CDRs on their high end CD players (if any will read CDRs yet) with a good amp and There is not a linear correlation between the two.QuoteIs it possible, that a bad codec colours the sound file in such a way, that it actually sounds better but not authentic Reply #6 – 09 July, 2004, 12:40:09 AM heh.

Obviously this testing would be alot easier if I could simply upgrade my equipment, although buying a pretty good headphone amp and perhaps a sound card might be sufficient.If I do granted i dont have an optical out on any equipment here... My main complaint is that you have to import every music file (or folder) that you want to burn to an atrac disk into the simple burner 2 library first. That minidisc player cost me somewhere around $700 and the DAT replacement was around $800 and I never regretted that decision for a second. -=Ducky=- Newbie Joined: 21 April, 2002 Posts:

Google "How to install the ATRAC3 ACM codec on 64-bit Windows ". Wide Hexadecatuple Ultra Extended Graphics Arra... Reply #14 – 10 July, 2004, 02:19:10 AM QuoteI think it would be interesting to run some sort of ABX test in a noise outdoor environment to find out which codec

Reply With Quote 05-21-2004,12:22 AM #115 Doormat Re: ATRAC3 & ATRAC3Plus Support I have no choice but to use this, since my Walkman is one of the old NW jobs, which

Yesterday i jus installed sonicstage 2.0 ive only spent a few mins on it but it seems reliable. All rights reserved. Full Review Alpha & Delta D2 Reviewed by shahkhan I am using these for more than a month now, and I am quite liking them, using them with my sony You should read them before posting.[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=224392"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]Whoops...

We can't say that they are spreading disinformation before we have checked all the possibilities. 12next Print Hydrogenaudio Forum Listening Tests ATRAC3 superior or inferior to mp3 ? and doesnt have sound support (videos are played without sound) It works, but is very annoying, i hope soon we will have something better to play all this files :) VIRGIN The only reason NOT to go higher is so that the music industry can continue to think they are not just giving away all their money if they use higher bitrate Joined 2/2005 Select All Posts By This User i would say that as long as you have the space on your MP3 player, go for the highest quality.

Username Forum Password I've forgotten my password Remember me This is not recommended for shared computers Sign in anonymously Don't add me to the active users list Privacy Policy Products Purchase And personally I can't understand howcome a codec that (maybe) colors the sound (as you speculate yourself) can be better. There seems to be some differences in formatting and some sort of DRM security built in. Nice, but i cant find info about it, i would like to add to wiki but i have some doubts: -it makes decoding and encoding....

the codec is very old (from PSP days)... I would never have noticed this ! Member Joined: 29 September, 2001 Posts: 413 Logged MPC -insane vs. Wilseyd, May 24, 2002 #3 berndawg84 Joined: Nov 8, 2001 Messages: 163 hmm, i dunno much about this stuff but it seems to me like ur gonna have to buy it.

In Goldwave u select wav and change Attributes to one of the ATRAC3's at bottom of the list. Cygnus X1 Hero Member Joined: 05 June, 2002 Posts: 676 Logged Members (Donating) MPC -insane vs. All rights reserved Back to Top⇧ Skip to main content ↑ ↓ Hydrogenaudio Forums 1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever Community Help Search Recent Posts Forum Terms String drivers. ” “Sound, UI, Touchscreen, OLED Display, HD Radio, Software, Zune Pass, Durability, Battery Life” » More on Zune HD 32 GB Video MP3 Player (Platinum) $399.00See it Head-Fi.org is

I am not saying that all codecs at 300kpbs are not transparent, just ATRAC3 (and probably MP3).